Elizabeth A. Garry, Presiding Justice of the Third Department, received an award during the New York State Bar Association conference at the New York Hilton on Thursday, January 17, 2018. (Photo by David Handschuh/NYLJ)
Lawyers argued over New York Congressional redistricting Thursday, with Appellate Division, Third Department Presiding Justice Elizabeth Garry saying the court was placed in “the awkward position of inferring” what a 2022 Court of Appeals decision meant by its silence on the duration of a remedial plan.
The case before the five appellate judges is captioned Hoffman v. New York State Independent Redistricting Commission, and it comes on the heels of the state’s highest court’s 4-3 ruling in Harkenrider v. Hochul, in April 2022.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
