Businesses need capital to scale and grow. So-called “finders,” individuals who connect businesses with investors in exchange for a fee, are an important capital-raising tool, especially for smaller and emerging companies that cannot attract institutional investors. Notwithstanding their importance to capital formation, the regulatory status of finders is murky. It is notoriously difficult to determine when a finder violates the securities laws by acting as an unregistered “broker.” This uncertainty leads to securities violations, unenforceable “finder’s fee” contracts, and lost capital-raising opportunities.

A recent decision in the Southern District of New York, Rhee v. SHVMS, 2023 WL 3319532 (S.D.N.Y. May 8, 2023), provides important guidance on the distinction between a finder and a broker. This article explains the distinction, the surrounding legal uncertainty, and how Rhee creates a practical roadmap for drafting compliant and enforceable “finder’s fee” agreements.

‘Broker’ Definition and Consequences

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]