Developing a Responsible Approach to Artificial Intelligence in Light of Developing Technologies and Regulation
A discussion of AI strategy in light of developing technologies and regulation including an overview of current legal restrictions in relation to AI; the developing body of guidance on the issue and common-sense considerations that will help organizations draft a rational and defensible AI strategy.
June 28, 2023 at 10:10 AM
8 minute read
On June 14, the European Parliament approved the Artificial Intelligence Act (the E.U. AI Act), a sweeping regulatory framework on par with the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that creates guidelines and prohibitions concerning the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The E.U. AI Act now proceeds to the so-called "trilogue" process, an informal negotiation involving members of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission. The trilogue process can take months, however, and the E.U. AI Act has been under consideration since it was first proposed in April 2021.
The E.U. AI Act is expected to be a signal development in the regulation of AI, applying not only to providers of AI solutions, but also to users of AI systems located within the E.U. and "providers and users of AI systems that are located in a third country, where the output produced by the system is used in the Union." See E.U. AI Act Art. II §1(c).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Not All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Orders Prosecution to Destroy Copies of Notes Found in Sean Combs' Prison Cell
- 2BIT Mining Bribery Scandal Highlights Trump-Biden Enforcement Gap
- 3AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
- 4Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
- 5$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
