In Samia v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 2023 U.S. Lexis 2637 (June 23, 2023), the U.S. Supreme Court declined to expand the rule in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) and, in fact, may have sounded the death knell for Bruton itself.

Over 50 years ago, the Supreme Court held, in Bruton, that, at a joint trial, the introduction of an out-of-court confession that implicates another defendant by name violates the confrontation clause, even if the jury is instructed not to consider the confession against the nonconfessing defendant.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]