Members of the Children’s Law Center, a chapter of UAW Local 2325, Association of Legal Aid Attorneys, form a picket line in downtown Brooklyn in front of the Children’s Law Center office on Monday July 17, 2023. The picket line represents the 3,000 legal service workers on strike for bad faith contract negotiations between the Children’s Law Center Union and management. Photo: Ryland West/ALM
During the 2022-2023 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several decisions with important implications for employers. This column reviews the court’s decisions addressing treatment of company property during labor strikes, what it means to be paid a salary, the undue hardship standard for defending the denial of a religious accommodation, and affirmative action.
Strike Limits
In Glacier Northwest v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174, 143 S. Ct 1404 (2023), the Supreme Court held in an 8-1 decision that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) did not preempt an employer’s state law claims that a union intentionally destroyed the employer’s property during a strike.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
