Distress investors ought to take heed from the analysis set forth in In re Golden Seahorse, 652 B.R. 593, 595 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2023). The Bankruptcy Court for the United States Southern District of New York confronted a legacy of divergent cases, arguments among commentators and a somewhat ambiguous legislative history on the issue of cure requirements for reinstatement of a loan with favorable terms to its prepetition status. If reinstatement is accomplished the lender is unimpaired, does not vote on a Chapter 11 plan and the loan remains outstanding despite its acceleration upon the filing of bankruptcy.

Distressed companies often skip a payment on prepetition debt, particularly any unsecured bond debt in the days leading up to commencing a bankruptcy, perhaps even letting any applicable grace periods expire prior to a bankruptcy filing.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]