SDNY District Executive's Office Gets Courthouse Into the Halloween Spirit
"It was a perfect representation of my courtroom," U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff told the Law Journal after having emerged from Friedland's office of horrors. "Just another day at the Southern District."
October 27, 2023 at 09:30 AM
2 minute read
SlideshowTerrifying tales abound from any courthouse docket. In the mid-1990s, the Southern District of New York handled a trademark case involving a real horror show. The distribution company for the Wes Craven-directed smash "Scream" sued the company behind "I Know What You Did Last Summer"—a teen-horror hit in its own right—over alleged references to Craven in its marketing campaign. U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum issued a 1998 ruling in the case that seems to encapsulate the mood behind one of the film's best-known lines: "What are you waiting for, huh?!" "It is in everybody's interest that this proceeding come to an end," Cedarbaum wrote in a ruling granting Miramax Films' motion to enjoin Columbia Pictures from using the contested phrasing in its marketing. "Removing 'From the Creator of Scream,' which as far as I can tell doesn't really cause you much difficulty, from every place that you have caused it to be used would resolve this entire proceeding." This Halloween, a ghoul from another Craven-directed franchise lurks in the Southern District—Freddy Kruger from Craven's "Nightmare on Elm Street," part of the now-haunted office of District Executive Ed Friedland that also incudes terrifying figures from "It," "Halloween," "Friday the 13th," "Mars Attacks!," "Haunted Mansion" and "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre." "It was a perfect representation of my courtroom," U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff told the Law Journal after having emerged from Friedland's office of horrors. "Just another day at the Southern District." Rakoff is part of a panel of six Southern District judges who will pick a winning exhibit from Friedland's office—to be announced after Halloween has passed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
Pelotons, Gym, Napping Rooms: Latest Law Firm Renovations 'Draw People' In with Home Amenities
4 minute readDonning the 'Dissent Chain': Asian American Judges Group Honors Judicial Leaders With Unorthodox Trophies
85-Year-Old New York Court Officer Retires After 62 Years of Service
Trending Stories
- 1Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
- 2Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 3Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
- 4Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
- 5New Associates Yearbook 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250