AI-Generated Artwork and Copyright Ownership
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in line with the U.S. Copyright Office's determination, found that the generative AI-created artwork at issue in 'Thaler v. Perlmutter' did not satisfy the Copyright Act's "human authorship" requirements.
November 07, 2023 at 10:00 AM
7 minute read
Intellectual PropertyOn Aug. 18, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment for the United States Copyright Office (Copyright Office) in Thaler v. Perlmutter, 1:22-cv-1564 (D.D.C.), affirming the Copyright Office's denial of copyright registration for artwork created by a generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) system.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'Fire All the Bullets Now': EEOC Enforcements Surge
- 4'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 5Suspect in Courthouse Bombing Was Targeting Judge, Deputies, Say Prosecutors
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250