The COVID-19 pandemic left no aspect of life untouched, and the legal system was certainly no exception. Just a few days before courts and offices began to close in March 2020, a federal judge allowed a juror who fell ill to deliberate via FaceTime. Litigators and jury consultants quickly adapted to the new world order, whether it was conducting jury selection through virtual platforms, delivering voir dire from behind masks and plexiglass or discussing cause challenges with the judge and adversaries through wireless headsets.

At the same time that lawyers adapted and courtrooms became virtual, something less tangible was happening as well: group dynamics among jurors were evolving.

Before the pandemic, jury consultants at Immersion Legal saw two hung juries between 2015 and 2020. Since the return to jury trials in late 2020, these same consultants were involved in 12 trials that resulted in hung juries and subsequent mistrials. Beyond this striking disparity, Immersion Legal experienced three additional juries who were only able to reach a verdict after receiving the court's Dynamite Instruction or Allen Charge, and we all noticed that juries seemed to be deliberating much longer than in years past. This left us wondering what could be driving these outcomes.