Does Supreme Court Have Discretion To Disregard an Appellate Order To Enter Judgment?
The title of this article suggests a notion that, in light of the highly complex and sophisticated rules of appellate procedure, is absurd. However, this very issue lies at the heart of the majority's compelling opinion, penned by Presiding Justice Diane T. Renwick, in 'Favourite v Cico'.
November 22, 2023 at 10:00 AM
14 minute read
The title of this article suggests a notion that, in light of the highly complex and sophisticated rules of appellate procedure, is absurd. However, this very issue lies at the heart of the majority's compelling opinion, penned by Presiding Justice Diane T. Renwick, in Favourite v Cico, 208 A.D.3d 99 [1st Dept 2022]: "This appeal raises the interesting question of whether a trial court has the discretion to grant a plaintiff leave to amend a complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b), after the Appellate Division has already ordered the complaint dismissed, with direction to enter judgment."
The Rules Governing the Duties of a Lower Court Upon Remand, Ministerial Acts
First, it is settled law that " '[a] trial court, upon remittitur, lacks the power to deviate from the mandate of the higher court" '…"An order or judgment entered by the lower court on a remittitur 'must conform strictly to the remittitur'"…The language in the decretal paragraph controls the extent of the remittitur." Daniele v. Pain Management Center of Long Island, 189 A.D.3d 1351, 1352 [2d Dept. 2020]; Stassa v. Stassa, 63 N.Y.S.3d 463, 465 [2d Dept. 2017]; Breidbart v. Wiesenthal, 93 A.D.3d 751, 752[2d Dept. 2012] ("A trial court, upon remittitur from a higher court, must obey the mandate of the higher court."); Trager v. Kampe, 16 A.D.3d 426 (2d Dept. 2005] ("[W]hen the decision and order of this court [] was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, the proceeding 'had to be remitted by the Court of Appeals to the trial court, and on that remittitur the Supreme Court had to enter a judgment' . . . The petitioner's filing of a note of issue was contrary to the terms of the remittitur."); Maracina v. Schirrmeister, 152 A.D.2d 502, 544 N.Y.S.2d 13 (1st Dept. 1989) ("Respondent cites no authority, and…none exists, to support the judge's disregard of the earlier order of this court. Trial courts are without authority to vacate or modify orders of the Appellate Division, or to reverse holdings of this court."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readDecision of the Day: Uber Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable for Driver's Alleged Negligent Conduct
US Courts Announce Closures in Observance of Jimmy Carter National Mourning Day
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250