EMA Financial sued Vystar for breach of their complex Jan. 2018 loan agreement. Vystar’s amended answer asserted counterclaims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment as against EMA.
Denying EMA’s motion for summary judgment, Magistrate Judge Gabriel Gorenstein of granted Vystar summary judgment dismissing EMA’s Feb. 19, 2019, complaint. Applying governing Delaware law the court held that EMA did not breach the parties’ contract when it deducted $3,200 from the parties’ stock purchase agreement for legal fees, which was specifically “non-accountable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
