It would appear axiomatic that the written word in a contract will almost always trump oral representations which predate that contract—especially where the contract includes customary language which merges any prior representation giving the document the last word on the parties’ rights and obligations. However, cases continue to appear before the bench which result in this hard lesson being learned, over and over again. In one such recent case before Judge Edgardo Ramos in the Southern District of New York, captioned Stephanie Clegg v. Sotheby’s, 23-cv-01995 decided on Nov. 30, 2023 (2023 WL 8281487), the plaintiff learned such a lesson.
The Facts
Briefly, Ms. Clegg brought an action for monetary damages and equitable rescission against Sotheby’s, Inc., arising out of her consignment of a painting, Le couple au bouquet de fleurs, c. 1950 (the “painting”), which was attributed to the renowned artist Marc Chagall. Ms. Clegg sought $175,000 in monetary damages claiming Sotheby’s breached its fiduciary duty, its contract, and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as well as committing gross negligence. This writing will focus on the fiduciary duty claim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
