This decision involved a dispute about a real estate brokers’ commission. The plaintiff alleged that it is a real estate broker and the defendant LLC (defendant) “cheated it out of a commission related to the sale of the building owned by defendant.” The defendant claimed that the subject agreement is “unenforceable.” The plaintiff had moved to amend the complaint to add the defendant’s principal (“A”) as a defendant.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had received $331,855 in proceeds from the sale of the subject building and that notwithstanding defendant’s knowledge that the plaintiff was seeking a commission, the defendant “transferred the entire amount of the proceeds to an account held by (“A”).” The plaintiff asserted that the transfer rendered the defendant “insolvent and nothing remains in the defendant’s bank account.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]