Caught in the Crossfire: Tools to Thrive—Navigating the Complex Terrain of New York Litigation
The fast-paced nature of the legal landscape demands not only legal acumen but also strategic thinking and a keen understanding of the tools at one's disposal. In this dynamic environment, lawyers need to equip themselves with a diverse array of resources to not only survive but thrive. This piece explores a few key tools to empower litigators in their quest for success.
January 05, 2024 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
In the bustling realm of New York litigation, attorneys find themselves caught in the crossfire of complex legal battles, where each case presents a unique set of challenges. The fast-paced nature of the legal landscape demands not only legal acumen but also strategic thinking and a keen understanding of the tools at one's disposal. In this dynamic environment, lawyers need to equip themselves with a diverse array of resources to not only survive but thrive. This piece explores a few key tools to empower litigators in their quest for success.
|Team Building
The importance of effective team building cannot be overstated. A cohesive legal team is not just a group of individuals working in proximity; it is the backbone of success in the complex and high-stakes legal battles that unfold in courtrooms across the city. Team building fosters collaboration, enhances communication, and cultivates a shared sense of purpose, creating a resilient foundation for navigating the challenges of litigation.
This is often the most overlooked aspect of litigation success. We promote "team value" when selling our services to the client and the depth of our bench but how many of us consciously engage in team building experiences throughout the year and during the litigation process? Effective team building is not a luxury but a strategic necessity. Put team building in the calendar and make it a priority within defined roles and responsibilities. Lead by encouraging and modeling collaboration.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Times Moves for $100K in Attorney Fees Against Dfinity Foundation
3 minute readHealth Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
NYC’s Oldest Deli Agrees to Update Bathrooms, Entrances to End ADA Charges
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Motions for Summary Judgment and Discovery: The 2021 Rule Changes Continue to Emerge
- 2Clark Hill Promotes a Record 29 Lawyers to Member
- 3People in the News—Jan. 3, 2025—Eckert Seamans, Kessler Topaz
- 4How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Stay True to Yourself, and Things Will Work Out to Your Benefit,' Says Stuart Sostmann of Marshall Dennehey
- 5Murder for Any Purpose Cannot be Condoned
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250