Top Trusts and Estates Developments, Lessons and Reminders of 2023
In this article, Sharon L. Klein highlights the top 10 developments, lessons and reminders out of the trusts and estates field from the previous year.
January 26, 2024 at 10:00 AM
19 minute read
By Sharon L. Klein
10. Planning Remains Critical to Minimize New York Estate Tax
The 2024 New York estate exemption amount has increased to $6.94 million. Since the benefits of the exemption are phased out for estates between 100% and 105% of the exemption amount and estates that exceed 105% are taxable from dollar one (N.Y. Tax Law §952(c)(1)), planning to bring estates in that range below the exemption amount can produce significant tax savings.
Because the New York exemption is not portable between spouses, it is also important to utilize the exemption amount of the first spouse to die, for example with credit shelter or disclaimer trust planning, otherwise it will be lost. Gifting up to the federal exemption amount ($13.61 million in 2024) to reduce the New York estate is a popular technique because, if the donor survives three years, those gifts will not be added back to the New York estate (N.Y. Tax Law §954(a)(3)).
9. Marriage Occurs When Legal Requirements Met; Not Individual Determination
In SF v. JS, 2023 NY Slip Op. 51033 (U), Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co, husband claimed no valid marriage existed because the wedding certificate was never filed, despite the couple having applied for a marriage license, celebrated a religious wedding ceremony before 200 guests, cohabited, held themselves out as a married couple and had a child. Husband had refused to file the wedding certificate until wife signed a prenuptial that the parties started negotiating before the wedding but never executed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
8 minute readGift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory
- 2Paul Hastings’ New Partner Talks Giving Control to Agentic AI, EU AI Act Impacts, and More
- 3Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer
- 4DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 5'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250