This decision involved motions for summary judgment made by the plaintiffs and the defendants in an action involving a mixed-use development and related land use issues.

The plaintiffs sought “declarations that the nay votes” cast by two town board members “effectively defeating plaintiffs’ ability to develop the commercial golf club aspect of the overall project be overturned, that the project local law be deemed enacted/directing the town board to enact the local law and approve the project; that damages be awarded to plaintiffs, and that reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation also be awarded to plaintiffs.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]