Preparing for the Expected and the Unexpected: The New York Department of Financial Services' Cybersecurity Regulation
While the sufficiency of cybersecurity programs was previously subject to "reasonableness" standards, an "acceptable" cybersecurity program has become more objective as regulators, such as NYDFS, continue to implement, amend and mature applicable laws.
March 01, 2024 at 10:00 AM
9 minute read
When the first public data breach occurred in 2005, there was little to no legal oversight in place. In response to data breaches, the threat actors typically garnered the exclusive responsibility. As the law has evolved and data security incidents have become more common, public and regulatory sentiment has shifted from blaming the threat actor toward holding the victim company accountable based on its purportedly deficient cybersecurity program.
While the sufficiency of these programs were previously subject to subjective "reasonableness" standards, an "acceptable" cybersecurity program has become more objective as regulators, such as the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), continue to implement, amend and mature applicable laws, laying out clear standards and expectations as described below.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
4 minute readAtkins Likely to Bring Pro-Business, Light Regulatory Touch to SEC, Say Agency Observers
SEC Commissioner Uyeda Predicts Eased Crypto Enforcement Under Next Chair
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Prepare Your Entries! The California Legal Awards Have a New, February Deadline
- 2DOJ Files Antitrust Suit to Block Amex GBT's Acquisition of Competitor
- 3K&L Gates Sheds Space, but Will Stay in Flagship Pittsburgh Office After Lease Renewal
- 4US Soccer Monopoly Trial Set to Kick Off in Brooklyn Federal Court
- 5NY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250