Politics From the Pulpit: Can a Church Really Say That?
"Religious organizations and leaders are faced with the same legal limitations as their secular tax-exempt counterparts," write Barry Black, Christopher Byrnes and Hillary Byrnes.
August 29, 2024 at 12:00 PM
11 minute read
NGO and Non-ProfitWith the 2024 election less than three months away, there could not be a better time for clergy and churches to refresh themselves on the legal parameters on what they can do and say about candidates, political parties, and public policy in an election year. Understandably, religious organizations and leaders often have strong religious and moral convictions on matters of public policy. When political parties and candidates have differences on policy matters, religious leaders often feel compelled to publicly bear witness to those convictions in the context of discussing elections. Religious organizations and leaders are faced with the same legal limitations as their secular tax-exempt counterparts. That is, organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Tax Code), may not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for federal, state, or local public office. This is known as the prohibition on political campaign intervention. This column will focus principally on the Tax Code's limitations on churches and clergy in their ministerial (non-personal) capacity and will not address any additional limitations imposed by federal election law.
At a minimum, the Tax Code's prohibition constrains churches—and clergy speaking on behalf of a denomination or house of worship—from explicitly endorsing or donating church funds or resources to a candidate for public office. For example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the IRS's revocation of tax-exempt status for a church in Binghamton, New York, that had taken out full-page advertisements in USA Today and The Washington Times four days before the 1992 U.S. presidential election urging Christians not to vote for then-candidate Bill Clinton. See Branch Ministries v. Rossotti, 211 F.3d 137 (D.C. Cir. 2000). But does the same prohibition prevent clergy and churches from taking stands on political issues on which parties and candidates themselves take public stands?
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
New York City’s Failure To Pay Its Bills Is Putting Vulnerable New Yorkers in the Crosshairs
4 minute read$17B Episcopal Church Pension Fund Hires New Legal Chief as Staff Changes Continue
Legal Aid Society Honors Milbank Attorney, Selendy Gay for Providing Pro Bono Firepower
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
- 2New York Environmental Legislation in 2024
- 3Cravath Hires Paul Weiss Antitrust Co-Chair
- 4Contract Technology Provider LegalOn Launches AI-powered Playbook Tool
- 5Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250