The Supreme Court Malicious Prosecution Decision
"Section 1983 authorizes a claim for relief only for violations of federally protected rights, not state law rights," writes Martin A. Schwartz.
August 30, 2024 at 02:00 PM
9 minute read
Constitutional LawLack of probable cause is an essential element of a Section 1983 Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim. What if the plaintiff was prosecuted on multiple criminal charges and there was probable cause for one charge but not another charge? In Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, 144 S. Ct. 1745 (2024), the court held that probable cause on one charge does not preclude a Section 1983 malicious prosecution claim based on lack of probable cause on another charge. The court, however, left open an important issue of causation.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250