New Revenue Streams: Transform unprofitable practices into thriving businesses
Learn how Gen AI can help lawyers to transform unprofitable practices into new revenue streams.
September 03, 2024 at 08:45 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Law firm leaders perceive that generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) technology is going to have a dramatic impact on how efficiently lawyers are able to complete work assignments for clients. The top priorities for law firms using AI-powered tech are all related to efficiency, according to the 2024 LexisNexis Investing in Legal Innovation Survey:
- Legal research (57%)
- Summarizing documents (53%)
- Drafting documents (38%)
These anticipated gains in efficiency have the potential to benefit clients who will receive legal counsel faster, as well as law firms who may be able to expand into new practice areas or even rehabilitate certain practices that have been struggling.
Transform pressured practice areas
The ability to practice more efficiently has law firms eyeing Gen AI's potential to support their business growth opportunities, according to the new report, Gen AI in Law: Unlocking New Revenues.
A quarter of Am Law 200 firm leaders say using Gen AI for business development reports is a top priority, with 21% saying they want to use Gen AI for real-time comparisons of law across different jurisdictions and connecting AI to organizational data.
"I expect that we'll see a focus on new lines of business and on advisory services that are proactive, rather than reactive," says Jeff Pfeifer, chief product officer at LexisNexis.
Gen AI could also help practice areas where margins are under pressure to become more profitable through repeatable process improvements.
"We hear this consistently among the firms that we're speaking with: they're looking for ways technologies can make a material improvement in work quality and work efficiency," adds Pfeifer. "Doing so makes those lines of business more attractive from a margin perspective."
For example, legal professionals who use Gen AI tools and services from LexisNexis typically free up seven to 11 hours per week, which Pfeifer notes can be used to either follow-up more rapidly on their next tasks or to expand services for other clients.
Clients expecting higher-value work
According to the Gen AI in Law: Unlocking New Revenues report, in-house teams also expect to see Gen AI tools free up their outside lawyers' time so they can focus on higher value work.
"We don't look at AI or Gen AI as being replacements to attorneys, but rather tools that augment what those attorneys are able to do with their own time," says Christy Jo Gedney, senior manager at Liberty Mutual Insurance. "We want our attorneys, whether they're in-house or outside counsel, to be practicing at the top of their licenses. We want them spending their time doing the things that are impactful, such as building relationships or prepping for trial. Using Gen AI tools will help give them the capacity to spend their time on more impactful matters."
For example, McGuireWoods is starting to see notable efficiency gains through adopting Gen AI for M&A due diligence by reviewing hundreds of contracts much faster than would be possible with a team of humans.
"The ability to use AI to surgically go into each one of those contracts and extract the information that you need and organize it into a spreadsheet as the first step of diligence can be a huge time saver," says Peter Geovanes, chief innovation and AI officer at McGuireWoods.
We interviewed a variety of AI leaders from the legal profession to explore how law firms and corporations that embrace Legal AI can generate new revenues through the use of this technology. In addition to the section of the report we unpacked today, which explores how to transform unprofitable practice areas into thriving businesses, other sections of the report include:
- An introduction to your new business development tool;
- Adapting to changing client mindsets about how to assess the value of legal work;
- How to seize new opportunities with the right skills in place; and
- Why law firms should start business innovation now to maximize success.
Read the full report now: Gen AI in Law: Unlocking New Revenues.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readDeal Watch: Latham, Skadden, Covington, Troutman, Fried Frank and Davis Polk Lead $10B+ Deals
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250