Evaluating Credit of a Privately-Held Company Without Getting Financial Statements
How do you check on a company's creditworthiness when the company is privately held and does not make its financial statements publicly available? The answer is that you need to check alternative sources of information for hints as to whether the company is experiencing problems.
September 16, 2024 at 08:00 AM
7 minute read
Special Sections
How do you check on a company's creditworthiness when the company is privately held and does not make its financial statements publicly available? The answer is that you need to check alternative sources of information for hints as to whether the company is experiencing problems. You need to ask the right questions and recognize the warning signs in the answers. It is recognized that the questions and actions recommended below may not be applicable to all privately held companies—especially smaller ones.
I begin with the following assumptions:
- Bondholders and secured lenders have access to information to which unsecured creditors typically do not.
- It is in the interests of bondholders and of secured lenders for the debtor to extract as much credit as possible from trade vendors. Their preference is for trade vendors to help finance the company through a period of financial stress or distress.
- If secured bond prices or bank loan prices are materially below par, it may mean that the banks or bondholders do not expect to be fully paid in a liquidation.
- If unsecured bonds are trading substantially below par it is likely that vendors are out of money in a liquidation of the debtor or in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
- Bankruptcy newsletters contain valuable information. They report information that are signals that you need to pay closer attention to an account.
Reevaluating credit:
- Start watching a company more closely if they have institutional debt (principal or interest) that matures within the coming year. Keep watching until you are convinced that refinancing will occur.
- Periodically check bond pricing and bank debt pricing. Pricing is indicative of what more informed people in the market are thinking. Journals like Debtwire, ReorgResearch, Bloomberg and Markit are examples of journals that carry this information. Start watching the company more closely if bond debt or bank debt prices are declining. Look at pricing over at least a 90-day time period. The lower it goes and the more consistent the decline, the more nervous you should be.
- Periodically run a lien search. Did a secured creditor demand and receive more collateral as the price of an amendment or forbearance? The additional collateral effectively reduces the size of the pot otherwise available for unsecured creditors.
- If you are told that payments are slow due to the debtor refinancing the company, it likely means that the debtor is having difficulty refinancing the company.
- If the debtor has hired attorneys or turnaround consultants well known for their bankruptcy expertise, it is a warning sign. The names of certain professional firms are closely associated with insolvency. The journals mentioned often carry this information.
- Periodically conduct a litigation search to see if any other creditors have commenced litigation. If vendors have commenced litigations, it should cause further inquiry even if the claims are settled or relatively small.
- When initially granting credit, calendar the maturity dates of the customer's term loan(s), revolving loan(s) and bonds. Also obtain the dates of interim principal and interest payments.
- First ask for updated financial statements. If you cannot receive written financial statements, then try to ask the questions below.
Questions to ask and why:
- When is the customer's next principal payment due on its bonds? A debtor may be current with vendors but not have adequate cash to make a principal payment.
- What is the maturity date of outstanding bank (secured) debt?
- Has an ad hoc committee of creditors (usually bondholders) been form? This indicates that creditors are worried and feel that they must engage with management to protect their interests.
- Has anyone received additional collateral recently? Granting additional collateral can be an indicator that the current lender feels inadequately collateralized.
- Is the debtor seeking to refinance any bank debt with a new lender? If so, difficulty may indicate the current lender's lack of confidence in the debtor's creditworthiness,
- Is the debtor party to a forbearance agreement? Forbearance agreements indicate that the borrower may be in default.
- Is the debtor in a grace period with regard to its institutional indebtedness? A grace period is exercised by a borrower in order to defer the lender exercising its rights and remedies.
- Has the debtor hired a chief restructuring officer, turnaround consultant or crisis manager? Engaging a professional firm that specializes in insolvency or turnarounds indicates that the debtor or its lender feels that management can not achieve a turnaround without outside assistance.
- How long have the debtor's current auditors been engaged by the debtor? Have auditors resigned in the preceding __ year(s)? Auditors resign because they may not have confidence in the client's financial record keeping or that the auditors have been asked to refrain from issuing a going concern opinion.
- Have any board members resigned in the preceding __ year(s)? Sometimes board members do not want to serve on the board of a financially distressed company.
- Does the debtor have any independent board members? Independent board members often are appointed due to the lack of confidence in the current board by key stakeholders.
- Has the debtor lost any customers in the preceding __ year(s) that accounted for more than __ % of annual sales? The loss of a major customer can destabilize a company.
- Has the CEO, COO, CFO or CEO changed in the preceding twelve months? Is anyone in the "C" suite serving in an acting or temporary capacity? Resignations or terminations may indicate a failure to achieve satisfactory results.
- Have the current equity holders provided the debtor with more working capital (debt or equity) in the preceding __year(s)? If yes, this is a basis for confidence. If not, then does it indicate an unwillingness to further infuse capital or a preference to just have the debtor borrow more funds from its banks?
- Did the company pay any dividends to equity holders in the preceding year (+). If so, how were the dividends funded (cash on hand, new financing or refinancing)? This is especially important if the company further encumbered its assets in order to do so.
- Does the debtor pay a management fee to its equity holders or to a party related to an equity holder? If the debtor is doing so during a period of distress, such payments may be an indicator that equity holders are putting their own interests ahead of being timely on payments to vendors.
- Is the debtor current with the payment of all local, state and federal taxes? Smaller companies often take involuntary loans from the government when cash is tight.
- Has the debtor issued a WARN Act notice? WARN notices often are reported in local community newspapers. These notices can be indicators of a downsizing or belt tightening in order to deal with financial distress.
- Is the debtor current with all of its employee obligations including union obligations, severance and wages/salaries? Holding back on union dues and pension obligations is effectively an involuntary loan—which the debtor may prefer to do if it cannot obtain additional funding from its main lender.
- Is there a guarantor for any of the debtor's indebtedness? It can be comforting if the guarantor thinks that a successful reorganization is the only way to get out from under their guarantee. On the other hand the guarantor may be deliberately pushing funds to the company lender and stretching out vendors in order to reduce their personal exposure.
Of course, extracting answers is easier said than done. Management of a distressed company usually does not want to share much information with vendors. And, your contact with a customer may not fully be aware of what is occurring in the "C" suite. Do the best you can. Ask questions anyway. And, be well aware of the warning signs.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 2Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 3How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 4Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
- 5Stevens & Lee Hires Ex-Middle District of Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney as White-Collar Co-Chair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250