Back to Basics: Constructive Notice Looked at From Both Sides
"It is not enough for a defendant merely to point to its general cleaning or inspection practices," write Robert S. Kelner, Gail S. Kelner and Joshua D. Kelner.
September 23, 2024 at 12:00 PM
13 minute read
Personal InjuryAmong the most common personal injury actions are those which occur as the result of unrepaired defective conditions, such as by slips, trips, or falls. In order to establish a prima facie case of liability arising out of such a defective condition, a plaintiff must show that the defendant either caused and created the dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of it.
Actual notice is self-explanatory. Defendant saw the condition ,was told about the condition or knew someone had been previously injured as a result of the condition but failed to remedy it. Prior written notice is perhaps the best known example of actual notice.
Where there is no evidence that defendant caused or created the condition or had actual notice, it is necessary to explore whether defendant can be held liable under principles of constructive notice. To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible, apparent, and exist for a sufficient length of time to permit defendant or its employees to discover and remedy the condition. Constructive notice may be established where there are witnesses who can demonstrate that the defect existed for a sufficient time to allow defendant to discover it. For example, acceptable proof could be testimony by someone who saw the defect a sufficient period of time before the accident, so that a timely inspection by defendant would have allowed the defective condition to be corrected in time to prevent the accident. Constructive notice may also be shown where the defect itself exhibited proof of its long-standing existence, such as visible rust, vegetation growing out of the crack at issue or other proof of an aging defect.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPracticing New York Attorney Found Liable for $26 Million for Exploitation of Client
Manhattan Jury Awards $116 Million for Wrongful Death in 2018 East River Helicopter Crash
Liability Over 2018 East River Helicopter Crash That Killed 5 Heads to Jury
Scott Stringer's Defamation Suit Survives Motion to Dismiss
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250