Funding Life-Income Charitable Gifts With IRAs
"Your clients can use up to $53,000 of their IRA's Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) to make life-income charitable gifts."
October 25, 2024 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
Smart Philanthropy
Your clients can use up to $53,000 of their IRA's Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) to make life-income charitable gifts.
The details:
- Charitable gift annuities (CGAs), charitable remainder unitrusts (CRUTs) and charitable remainder annuity trusts (CRATs) can be funded by transfers (rollovers) to qualified charities from their IRAs.
- Available to taxpayers 70½ or over.
- Qualified income beneficiaries: the IRA owner, the spouse or both.
- $53,000 maximum.
- Caution—the fine print: a one-year only transfer. If a taxpayer rolls over a lesser amount—say $10,000—she can't rollover even one penny in future tax years. But, she can rollover the balance of $43,000 in the same year.
More rules:
- Minimum payout is five percent—all payouts by the life income plan are taxable as ordinary income.
- No income tax charitable deduction.
- Withdrawals up to $53,000 aren't taxable—even if it's a Required Minimum Distribution (RMD). Not being taxed is the equivalent of a charitable deduction. But remember, the income payments each year are taxable.
- All public charities (except Donor Advised Funds (DAFs) and Supporting Organizations) are qualified recipients.
The law allowing tax-free IRA direct transfers to charities of up to $105,000 annually (no life-income) isn't changed. This is the indexed for inflation amount for 2024.
Although the law allows donors to fund CRUTs and CRATs with up to $53,000, for life-income gifts, that low amount generally makes CRUTs and CRATs impractical. However, $53,000 (or less) makes transfers for charitable gift annuities attractive.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York’s Property Tax Incentives and Abatements Make Development Feasible
7 minute readTreasury Issues New Regulations on Allocation of Partnership Liabilities
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250