NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
A new rule set to take effect Dec. 1 requires New York attorneys to confirm whether they remain in good standing in out-of-state jurisdictions where they are admitted to practice law. It also requires all attorneys to disclose whether they have ever been the subject of public discipline in any other jurisdiction.
November 12, 2024 at 04:05 PM
2 minute read
New York attorneys will soon be required to notify the court system about matters on which they are subject to public discipline in other states as part of forthcoming biennial reporting rules about admissions in other jurisdictions.
In a statement on Tuesday, Chief Administrative Judge Joseph A. Zayas said he signed an administrative order in consultation with Chief Judge Rowan D. Wilson and the new rules take effect on Dec. 1.
All registrations must be filed via the mandatory online system.
The amendment first requires attorneys to list any admissions, excluding pro hac vice admissions, in other U.S. states and territories, U.S. federal courts, or jurisdictions outside of the United States.
In addition, the new requirement will ask attorneys to confirm whether they remain in good standing in those jurisdictions, and to disclose whether they have ever been the subject of public discipline in any other jurisdiction and, if so, when they provided notice to New York courts, as required by the Joint Rules of the Appellate Divisions.
The statement didn’t say what prompted the rule change, and court officials couldn't immediately be reached for comment when contacted by the Law Journal on Tuesday.
New York has a reciprocal discipline process that allows appellate courts to discipline an attorney for matters that arise in other states.
As such, New York attorneys are required to notify the New York court in which they were admitted, and the appropriate grievance committee within 30 days of an out-of-state disciplinary ruling.
Nevertheless, New York attorneys sometimes forget about this rule, resulting in a potential additional sanction in the Empire State, according to retired state Supreme Court Justice Barry Kamins.
With that in mind, the chief administrative judge’s new reporting rules will be helpful to attorneys, Kamins, a partner in Aidala Bertuna & Kamins, told the Law Journal.
"In a way, it will assist them in complying with the rules. At least this will remind them of their obligations,” said Kamins, who represents attorneys in matters before grievance committees and once chaired the grievance committee in the Second, 11th and 13th judicial districts.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250