Walmart Accused of Misrepresenting 'Cheese' Ingredients in Great Value's Macaroni & Cheese
Walmart is accused of falsely labeling their Great Value macaroni and cheese as containing "real cheddar cheese."
November 12, 2024 at 05:39 PM
3 minute read
Walmart was named in a consumer class action accusing the retailer of mislabeling its Great Value brand macaroni and cheese product as being "made with real cheddar cheese" when the predominant components of the "cheese" are made from whey and maltodextrin.
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just-filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be among the first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
The complaint, filed Nov. 11 in New York Supreme Court for Westchester County by Sheehan & Associates, maintains that Walmart markets the product as containing "real cheddar cheese," despite the fact that there is little to no "real cheddar cheese" present. The plaintiff, Dolores Gay, claims the defendants misled consumers into purchasing the product due to its misrepresentations regarding the product's contents.
Gay claims that she relied on the product's labeling to tell her about the ingredients in the product and expected real cheddar cheese to be the predominant ingredient, or at least present in a significant amount. Because of these misrepresentations, Gay claims she bought the product and paid more than she would have had she known real cheese wasn't present in a significant amount.
"The product is 'misbranded' and misleads consumers, because the labeling and packaging, 'made with real cheddar cheese,' 'fails to reveal facts material in light of such representations,' because in place of an absolute and relatively greater amount of real cheddar cheese, it has substituted whey, maltodextrin, and/or palm oil, replacements for real cheddar cheese," the complaint said.
The complaint alleges that whey, maltodextrin and palm oil are lower quality and lower cost cheese substitutes, which are added as fillers or bulking agents to help imitate the taste and attributes of cheese. The plaintiff further claims that these substitutions are of interest to consumers as real cheddar cheese costs more than the products Walmart substitutes it with, contains more nutrients, and has a different taste. As a result of the false representations, the product is sold higher than similar products that are not represented in a misleading way, and sold for higher than it would be absent the misleading representations, according to the plaintiff.
Gay brought claims for General Business Law (GBL) Sections 349 and 350, and requests class certification, monetary damages and interest, attorney fees, costs and expenses.
"We are committed to offering high-quality products and will review the complaint and respond appropriately to the court," a Walmart spokesperson said.
Sheehan, the plaintiff's counsel in Great Neck, New York, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Counsel has not yet appeared for the defendant.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appeals Court Grants J&J's Subpoena for Talc Expert as 'Clearly Relevant'
6 minute readTrack Star Alleges Gatorade's 'Recovery Gummies' Ruined Shot at Appearing in Summer Olympics
3 minute readDecision of the Day: Products Trade Group Lacks Standing to Sue New York AG Over Supplement Bans
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250