'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
“All signs—most notably the recent surge in bitcoin’s price—point to a new day for bitcoin specifically and crypto in general,” said Tal J. Lifshitz, a partner at Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton.
November 13, 2024 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
What You Need to Know
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initiated a nearly 800% litigation surge on the cryptocurrency sector in October.
- A securities litigation expert said attorneys can expect a slowdown in these types of enforcement actions under President-elect Donald Trump.
- The SEC brought at least six federal enforcement actions against crypto companies, which is well above the typical monthly average.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initiated a nearly 800% litigation surge on the cryptocurrency sector in October, according to an analysis of data collected by Law.com Trend Detection.
David Elsberg, an Elsberg Baker & Maruri partner in New York and a securities litigation expert, said that attorneys can expect a slowdown in these types of enforcement actions, meaning fewer matters in the pipeline for lawyers who litigate these types of cases, as Donald Trump put crypto front and center in his presidential campaigns in a way not seen before.
“He has made public statements giving the impression that he will shape a regime that will be more supportive of crypto than perhaps any government we’ve seen so far around the globe,” Elsberg said in an email. “For example, Trump publicly announced that he will create a presidential crypto advisory council, and that the rules for crypto will be ‘written by people who love your industry, not hate your industry.’ And he came out strongly against SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who has brought dozens of proceedings against crypto firms.”
The Trend Detection data shows that the SEC brought at least six federal enforcement actions against crypto companies, which is well above the typical monthly average. Surges, such as the nearly 800% here, are identified by comparing caseloads for a given period to a baseline average after accounting for normal variations in the ebb and flow of case filings.
The SEC filed most of the complaints in the U.S. District Court in the District of Massachusetts, alleging that the companies engaged in “wash trading,” a form of market manipulation in which an entity simultaneously sells and buys the same financial instruments, creating a false impression of market activity without incurring market risk or changing the entity's market position.
The SEC claimed in the lawsuits that the wash trading was through the purchase and selling of digital assets, including Saitama Inu and Robo Inu. And some of the defendants, who include ZM Quant Investment, CLS Global FZC and Gotbit Hedge Fund, allegedly agreed to wash trade assets purportedly owned by NexFundAI, according to the complaint.
However, NexFundAI was apparently an undercover operation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to look into crypto asset market manipulation.
Tal J. Lifshitz, a partner at Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton in Coral Gables whose expertise includes digital asset litigation, said the larger takeaway from the data is that it highlights the “final countdown” on the Biden administration’s regulation-by-enforcement approach to crypto.
“All signs—most notably the recent surge in bitcoin’s price—point to a new day for bitcoin specifically and crypto in general,” Lifshitz said in an email. “I look forward to seeing the unshackled innovation of this sector in the years to come.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250