'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
“All signs—most notably the recent surge in bitcoin’s price—point to a new day for bitcoin specifically and crypto in general,” said Tal J. Lifshitz, a partner at Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton.
November 13, 2024 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
CryptocurrencyWhat You Need to Know
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initiated a nearly 800% litigation surge on the cryptocurrency sector in October.
- A securities litigation expert said attorneys can expect a slowdown in these types of enforcement actions under President-elect Donald Trump.
- The SEC brought at least six federal enforcement actions against crypto companies, which is well above the typical monthly average.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initiated a nearly 800% litigation surge on the cryptocurrency sector in October, according to an analysis of data collected by Law.com Trend Detection.
David Elsberg, an Elsberg Baker & Maruri partner in New York and a securities litigation expert, said that attorneys can expect a slowdown in these types of enforcement actions, meaning fewer matters in the pipeline for lawyers who litigate these types of cases, as Donald Trump put crypto front and center in his presidential campaigns in a way not seen before.
“He has made public statements giving the impression that he will shape a regime that will be more supportive of crypto than perhaps any government we’ve seen so far around the globe,” Elsberg said in an email. “For example, Trump publicly announced that he will create a presidential crypto advisory council, and that the rules for crypto will be ‘written by people who love your industry, not hate your industry.’ And he came out strongly against SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who has brought dozens of proceedings against crypto firms.”
The Trend Detection data shows that the SEC brought at least six federal enforcement actions against crypto companies, which is well above the typical monthly average. Surges, such as the nearly 800% here, are identified by comparing caseloads for a given period to a baseline average after accounting for normal variations in the ebb and flow of case filings.
The SEC filed most of the complaints in the U.S. District Court in the District of Massachusetts, alleging that the companies engaged in “wash trading,” a form of market manipulation in which an entity simultaneously sells and buys the same financial instruments, creating a false impression of market activity without incurring market risk or changing the entity's market position.
The SEC claimed in the lawsuits that the wash trading was through the purchase and selling of digital assets, including Saitama Inu and Robo Inu. And some of the defendants, who include ZM Quant Investment, CLS Global FZC and Gotbit Hedge Fund, allegedly agreed to wash trade assets purportedly owned by NexFundAI, according to the complaint.
However, NexFundAI was apparently an undercover operation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to look into crypto asset market manipulation.
Tal J. Lifshitz, a partner at Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton in Coral Gables whose expertise includes digital asset litigation, said the larger takeaway from the data is that it highlights the “final countdown” on the Biden administration’s regulation-by-enforcement approach to crypto.
“All signs—most notably the recent surge in bitcoin’s price—point to a new day for bitcoin specifically and crypto in general,” Lifshitz said in an email. “I look forward to seeing the unshackled innovation of this sector in the years to come.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDapper Labs $4M Settlement, $1.3M in Attorney Fees Reveal NFT Settlement Trend
4 minute readFormer FTX Executive Nishad Singh Sentenced to Time Served
Chainalysis Beats $650 Million Lawsuit for Report Labeling Crypto Company 'Scam'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250