Blue-Ribbon Panel Calls for Pay Bumps for NYS Commissioners, But Says No to Lawmakers, Elected Officials
The New York State Commission on Legislative, Judicial and Executive Compensation—chaired by retired New York Court of Appeals Judge Eugene Fahey—said it was too soon to give lawmakers a raise, after the most recent $32,000 per year bump.
November 14, 2024 at 05:10 PM
3 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Blue-ribbon panel says it's too soon to give the New York Legislature pay increases, after it received a $32,000 raise in 2023..
- But it granted raises to statewide agency heads, including a group of top-tier commissioners and superintendents whose pay will rise to $245,000.
- The commission had already recommended raises for state judges.
A blue-ribbon, quadrennial New York commission unanimously voted Thursday not to increase Albany lawmakers' salaries in 2025, citing a recent 29% increase to legislators’ nation-leading $142,000-a-year salaries in January 2023.
The New York State Commission on Legislative, Judicial and Executive Compensation—chaired by retired New York Court of Appeals Judge Eugene Fahey—said it was too soon to give lawmakers a raise, after the most recent $32,000 per year bump.
Likewise, the commission recommended that Gov. Kathy Hochul, whose annual salary is $250,000, and the lieutenant governor, attorney general and comptroller shouldn’t receive pay increases in 2025. Those roles were last given pay increases in January 2021, when the governor got a $25,000 raise, and the lieutenant governor, AG and comptroller got $10,000 increases, to $220,000.
The commission's final report recommends raises for state Executive Department commissioners and deputy commissioners covered under Section 169 of the New York State Budget statutory outline.
The highest-tiered commissioners, such as state Department of Financial Services Superintendent Adrienne Harris, will receive $25,000 a year increases, from $220,000 to $245,000 in 2025, with a two-percent increase in 2027.
The pay bump is to right what commissioners said was the injustice that those agency heads were sometimes earning less than unionized subordinates, and agency heads in similar roles who work for the New York City government.
For example, the state financial services watchdog’s present $220,000 annual salary is $57,604 less than New York City’s commissioner of finance, meaning, even with the looming 2025 raise, it will still be more than $32,000 less than the city counterpart's job.
Kathyrn Garcia, director of New York's operations and infrastructure, had previously testified to the commission that state commissioners and agency officials’ salaries hadn’t kept pace with the private sector, and not granting them raises put the state at risk of losing talent and its ability to attract the best candidates for these positions.
Garcia had also noted that inaction would mean the state wouldn’t have another opportunity to increase their pay until 2029.
Regarding the Legislature’s substantial pay increase in 2023, the move was accompanied by setting a $35,000 cap on the amount of outside income they may earn. But the limitation is currently being challenged in a state court.
Meanwhile, the commission had already finished its work relative to judicial compensation, when it recommended state judges receive 10.3% salary increases, their first raises since 2019. The judicial raises took effect at the start of the fiscal year in April, boosting state Supreme Court justices’ pay from $210,900 to $232,600 annually, and the chief judge’s from $240,800 to $265,600.
“This is a thankless job,” Fahey, the retired top court judge and commission chairman said in putting a wrap on the panel's work. Fahey thanked the six other members for their time traveling the state and working for more than two years to bring forward the final report.
“I believe that fair compensation for our elected officials preserves the integrity of our elected system,” Fahey said. “That fair compensation is protected when it’s led by, endorsed by, and scrutinized by the citizens of the state, and you’ve all done that.”
Fahey and fellow commissioner, attorney Helene Blank, were appointed by Chief Judge Rowan Wilson. Other legal luminaries on the panel were retired Queens Administrative Judge Jeremy S. Weinstein, an appointee of the Senate majority leader, attorney Theresa Egan, appointed by the Assembly speaker, and Victor Kovner, senior counsel to Davis Wright Tremaine, an appointee of the governor.
The commission held its meetings at the New York City Bar Association, a site that reflected the nonpartisan nature of the commission's work.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
Trending Stories
- 1'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 2Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
- 3Jury That Convicted Ex-Sen. Robert Menendez Accidentally Saw Improper Evidence, Prosecutors Say
- 4Freshfields Hires DOJ Official, Squire Taps Paul Hastings Atty for US Antitrust Head
- 5Goodbye 'Yellow Freight' Road?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250