Rudy Giuliani's Attorneys Seek Withdrawal in Debt Enforcement Case
The motion comes less than a week after the former New York City mayor was ordered to appear in court as part of efforts to collect on a $148 million defamation judgment against him, and was threatened with civil contempt.
November 14, 2024 at 02:10 PM
3 minute read
LitigationLawyers for Rudy Giuliani are asking a judge to relieve them of their representation of the former New York City mayor in his debt enforcement case, citing an unspecified “fundamental disagreement.”
In a heavily redacted document, attorneys Kenneth Caruso and David Labknowski said they must terminate their representation of the embattled ex-lawyer, citing ethics rules that allow them to do so when a client insists on “taking action with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement” or “the client insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument.”
The motion comes less than a week after Giuliani was ordered to appear in court as part of efforts to collect on a $148 million defamation judgment against him, and was threatened with civil contempt.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman has yet to rule on the motion.
Giuliani, 80, has continually fought attempts by Georgia poll workers Rudy Freeman and Wandrea "Shaye" Moss to collect on the massive verdict they were awarded last year following Giuliani’s false claims that they committed election fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
Freeman and Moss are represented by a team from Willkie Farr & Gallagher and have been fighting to enforce the award in Manhattan federal court.
Liman previously granted Freeman and Moss ownership of Giuliani’s mulitmillion-dollar Manhattan penthouse, and placed other assets into a receivership.
The plaintiffs' lawyer, Aaron Natah, has repeatedly raised concerns that Giuliani may be hiding assets, most recently claiming again on Wednesday that property had again been moved in violation of the receivership order as they struggle to locate assets.
At one point during his appearance in court last week, Liman threatened to place the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District under oath if he continued to refuse to answer questions about his finances.
Giuliani faced the same threat earlier this year during his failed attempt to secure bankruptcy protection.
A judge dismissed that case, finding that the now twice-disbarred attorney was not being transparent about his finances.
Should Liman grant the defense team’s motion, Giuliani would likely be left to fend for himself pro se.
He has attempted to do so in other unrelated civil litigation, though another judge last month urged Giuliani to bring in an attorney.
"You should strongly consider finding other counsel,” Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Moyne told Giuliani during a chaotic and combative virtual hearing. "I'm going to protect you from yourself.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
Standing on Less Shaky Ground: 'Guthrie' Decision Impact on NY Wage and Hour Matters
7 minute readThe First Amendment on Trial: Factors That Influence Juror Receptivity
9 minute readThe Pros and Cons of Generative AI in Connection With Litigation Practices
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$400M Case: Trustee Claims Instant Pot-Maker Defrauded Lenders
- 2NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing Efforts
- 3The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
- 4Bosworth Claims It Was Kline & Specter, Not Him, That Breached Settlement Terms
- 5K&L Gates Faces Malpractice Suit: 'An Experienced Labor Attorney Would Know'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250