Justice in the 21st Century, New Visions, New Realities—A New Dawn of Justice
As we look ahead, diversity, technological advancement, and collaboration will be essential pillars in shaping a judiciary that serves all members of our society.
January 13, 2025 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
The theme “NYSBA’s Judicial Section Centennial—Honoring Tradition, Shaping the Future: Justice in the 21st Century, New Visions, New Realities—A New Dawn of Justice” is more than a statement. It’s a call to action for all NYSBA Judicial Section members. As we look back on our history, we must honor our traditions and understand the principles that have guided us. These principles—fairness, respect for the law, and a commitment to serving the public good are the foundation for building a more diverse and inclusive future. Honoring tradition is not about clinging to the past but learning from it and using that knowledge to shape a better future. As we look ahead, diversity, technological advancement, and collaboration will be essential pillars in shaping a judiciary that serves all members of our society.
The legal landscape has evolved significantly, with diversity playing a pivotal role in shaping the judiciary. Unlike the homogeneous benches of the past, today’s courts are increasingly diverse. This shift is not just symbolic but ensures that the judiciary mirrors the diversity of the communities it serves. A diverse judiciary is better equipped to comprehend and empathize with the experiences of different communities, leading to a more equitable application of the law. It promotes diverse legal interpretation and decision-making perspectives, ultimately resulting in more just outcomes. Moreover, representation is significant. When individuals see judges who share their backgrounds and experiences, it fosters a sense of belonging, trust, and confidence in the judicial system.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWestern NY Justice Agrees to Public Admonishment Over 'Obvious' Conflict of Interest
Meet the Long Island Judge Tapped to Be US Attorney for Eastern District of New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Navigating the Shifting Sands of E-Discovery and Information Governance in 2025
- 2A Plan for Coordinating State Action on Environmental Protection as the Federal Government Rolls Back National Efforts
- 3Alston & Bird, Eversheds Sutherland Ranked Among Top Firms Globally for M&A Deals in 2024
- 4Sheppard Mullin Expands in Dallas With 6-Lawyer White Collar Team From Bradley
- 5Kirkland, Latham, White & Case Work on $16.4B Energy Deal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250