Presiding Justice Dianne T. Renwick speaks after taking the oath of office. Photo: Ryland West/ALMWhat AI Cannot Do for You
The author writes "As artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) rapidly evolve, they are reshaping the legal landscape in ways that lawyers and judges are only beginning to grasp. From drafting contracts to predicting case outcomes, these technologies promise efficiency but also pose significant challenges—raising questions about accuracy and ethical implications, and the very nature of justice."
January 13, 2025 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
As artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) rapidly evolve, they are reshaping the legal landscape in ways that lawyers and judges are only beginning to grasp. From drafting contracts to predicting case outcomes, these technologies promise efficiency but also pose significant challenges—raising questions about accuracy and ethical implications, and the very nature of justice. As the courtroom faces this digital revolution, legal professionals must navigate uncharted waters where innovation and tradition collide, and where the stakes of human judgment have never been higher.
You may not have realized it, but the preceding paragraph was entirely AI-generated. The answer was generated by ChatGPT when queried on the challenges AI poses for the legal profession (quotation marks were omitted to demonstrate how well AI can mimic the writing and analysis of a human).
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1Trusting Your Instincts (and Second-Guessing Anyway)
- 2Kirkland, Cleary, King & Spalding Among the Latest to Add DC Laterals
- 3What KPMG's London Experience Reveals About Its U.S. Strategy
- 4Some Los Angeles Law Schools Begin Spring Semester Remotely
- 5'Full-Throated Apology': Legal Theory in the Grant Cardone/John Legere Feud
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
