Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
The author writes "This year, estate planning practitioners have significant opportunities for estate tax savings for our high-net-worth clients. Time is critical though, and there are some traps for the unwary in selecting strategies to adopt."
January 20, 2025 at 11:00 AM
7 minute read
This year, estate planning practitioners have significant opportunities for estate tax savings for our high-net-worth clients. Time is critical though, and there are some traps for the unwary in selecting strategies to adopt. Here are three major issues in our high net worth planning engagements this year:
- New York’s estate tax does not regulate lifetime gifting. This is a very good feature of our NY Law. The trap, though, is most gifts made within three years of the date of death are brought back into the taxable estate of the client.
- New York State’s estate tax exemption appears very high. The exemption in 2025 is $7.16MM. However, if the estate exceeds this amount by more than 5%, the entire estate is taxed, not just the excess—this is known as the tax cliff. Additionally, the New York exemption is not portable to a surviving spouse’s estate, causing clients to lose any unused exemption.
- The federal estate tax exemption will be halved, from just under $14MM down to $7MM, at the end of 2025. Clients can use the full $14MM now or lose it and be left with only the $7MM. They cannot gift $7MM only in 2025 and claim another $7MM when the exemption is lowered in 2026. Any gifting is applied first against the new exemption amount in 2026. So the value of gifting in 2025 for federal estate tax savings comes from gifting above 7MM but less than 14 million, unless the client is willing to pay a gift tax.
This article will detail each of the above and identify planning opportunities to address all three.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCaught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 2Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 3Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 4Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
- 5Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250