Menendez Asks US Judge for Bond Pending Appeal of Criminal Conviction
The 71-year-old’s appeal, his lawyers write, will present substantial questions of law or fact and their client presents no flight risk.
January 28, 2025 at 05:41 PM
2 minute read
Former U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez on Tuesday asked a judge that he be allowed to remain out on bail pending appeal of his case, currently scheduled for sentencing on Wednesday.
“Having gone from operative indictment to sentencing in just ten months, a septuagenarian who devoted half a century to public service should not be rushed to prison before the Court of Appeals has an opportunity to consider the significant legal issues presented,” writes defense counsel.
The 71-year-old’s appeal, his lawyers write, will present substantial questions of law or fact. Menendez, who served as a Democrat from New Jersey, also poses no flight risk, the filing states.
Menendez and his co-defendants Wael Hana and Fred Daibes are scheduled to appear on Wednesday before U.S. District Court Judge Sidney Stein of the Southern District of New York for sentencing.
The trio were found guilty of all charges by a jury in July. Menendez denies any wrongdoing, while prosecutors claim he accepted bribes, including gold bars, from New Jersey businessmen.
Prosecutors have asked Stein to sentence the Democrat to 15 years in prison, while the defense says a sentence of less than two years is appropriate.
Menendez has maintained his plans to appeal.
“At virtually every turn, the government tested the border of notoriously murky legal lines,” the Tuesday defense filing states. “On nearly every point, courts or scholars have agreed with the Senator’s legal positions. That suffices to establish that the questions are substantial.”
The issues include the difference between ‘legislative acts’ and political acts under the Speech or Debate Clause as well as colloquial ‘pressure’ versus official actions, as defined under McDonnell v US.
Another deficiency is the decision to charge the case in the Southern District of New York, the defense says, saying that venue rested on “a few fleeting contacts” with the district and each are debatable in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Should the appeals court side with the defense, a new trial is likely, which supports the idea Menendez should remain out on bail, his lawyers say.
Menendez is represented by Adam Fee and Avi Weitzman of Paul Hastings.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readJona Rechnitz Sentencing in Federal Court Is Postponed to June
Charlie Javice Fraud Trial Delayed as Judge Denies Motion to Sever
Trending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Says Global Clients Are Noticing ‘Expanded Capacity’ After Kramer Merger in Paris
- 2'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 3Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 4How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 5Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250