DHCR also relied on RSC § 2527.7, captioned “Pending Proceedings,” which states in its entirety:
DHCR, attempting to balance the equities, ruled that the landlord would get the benefit of the new regulation (which resulted in the dismissal of the tenant’s FMRA), while the tenant, in turn, would be relieved of the obligation of paying rent arrears occasioned by DHCR’s initial determination in her favor.
Second Article 78 Action
The landlord brought an Article 78 proceeding to challenge DHCR’s May 25, 2004 order. The matter was assigned to Justice Edward H. Lehner, who ruled on Feb. 9, 2005.1 Justice Lehner held that DHCR, even though broadly empowered to consider the “equities,” had no authority to forgive rent arrears:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]