The recent global financial collapse has underscored the need for buyers in M&A transactions to provide for an effective exit from closing if the target business suffers a material adverse change (MAC) prior to closing. Buyers face a dilemma in relying on MAC conditions even in the current economic environment: most courts impose a significant burden on a buyer in demonstrating that a MAC has occurred justifying a walkaway from the deal. In fact, the Delaware Court of Chancery has yet to find that a material adverse change has occurred in the context of an M&A transaction.

However, through the case law that exists on the subject, the courts have signaled receptivity toward enforcing MAC provisions that set forth objective quantifiable metrics. As the M&A market continues to rotate in favor of buyers, now is the time for buyers to enhance the certainty of the MAC condition by including objective quantifiable metrics that would result in greater clarity and effectiveness of such provisions. This article will provide a basis for such a transition to the use of MAC provisions with greater specificity and also provide suggestions for increased precision.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]