A Manhattan appeals panel has upheld the dismissal of fraud and legal malpractice claims brought against a prominent Manhattan litigator, his current firm and two others where he had worked. However, the Appellate Division, First Department, disputed the lower court’s holding that a malpractice claim against one of his former firms was time-barred. Instead, it ruled that the statute of limitations was tolled while the attorney had continued to represent the plaintiff in the same matter, even though he had moved to a different law firm.

Retired Texas oil executive J. Virgil Waggoner sued Kenneth A. Caruso, a partner in the New York office of Bracewell & Giuliani, for allegedly conspiring in the theft of a $10 million investment the lawyer had been retained to recover. The suit also named Bracewell & Giuliani as a defendant, as well as Chadbourne & Parke and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, the other firms at which Mr. Caruso worked. Mr. Waggoner had made his ill-fated investment through a Caribbean Bank, and his lawsuit claimed Mr. Caruso failed to aggressively pursue claims against the bank because he was aligned with the alleged fraud’s perpetrators.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]