A Manhattan judge has taken to task some well-known personal injury attorneys for what she called a “nonsensical and frivolous” bid to recoup the costs of an unsuccessful medical malpractice action.
“[T]he following illustrates why members of the public may hold cynical views of the legal profession,” Supreme Court Justice Emily Jane Goodman (See Profile) began her ruling in Kremen v. Benedict P. Morelli & Associates, 101739/06.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
