A recent decision by the New York County Civil Court in Sol De Ibiza LLC v. Panjo Realty Inc.1 leads us to return to a subject, “self-help,” that we addressed in this column many years ago.2 That term is shorthand for the right of a landlord to re-enter and re-take possession from a commercial tenant without prior court proceedings, provided it is done without breach of peace. Such self-help against a residential tenant is not permissible.
In Sol De Ibiza, noting that his determination was reached “[a]fter much deliberation” and that “this Court does not reach this decision lightly,” Judge Arthur F. Engoron held that the landlord there did not have the right to use self-help. In doing so, the court sought to distinguish—but, ultimately, was prepared to reject as “an aberration”—an Appellate Division, Third Department, decision involving similar facts. We discuss here the court’s reasoning and the implications of the case for the issue of self-help as a remedy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
