Last year, New York state courts ruled on a variety of class actions pursuant to CPLR Article 9 involving post-settlement discovery issues, deceptive price matching, cell phone plans, fixed price contracts, employee gratuities, terminal and cable TV converter boxes, insurance company demutualization, microprint equipment leases, brokerage account maintenance fees, backdating involving renewal of wholesale store memberships, and attorney’s fees.

Post-Settlement Discovery

In Wyly v. Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, LLP,1 the Court of Appeals limited discovery of files of class counsel dismissed by the trial court. “In a class action, however, an absent class member does not possess a ‘broad right’ of access to the files of a class counsel dismissed by the trial court during the litigation’s pendency.” The Court noted that this broad right would create “the potential for class counsel to be unduly burdened, even after the end of litigation, by a multitude of requests from absent class members for counsel’s entire file.”

Deceptive Price Matching

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]