Sponsor Entitled to Keep Deposit of Defaulting Purchaser—Court Noted That “Recent National Financial Crisis Has Unfortunately Snared Another Innocent Victim”—Court Rejects Fraud Claim—Attorney’s Fees Denied in the Interest of Justice
In November 2007, a purchaser (plaintiff) signed a contract to buy for $1.9 million, a condominium unit that is now for sale at 35 percent less or $1.3 million. Thus, the plaintiff would have lost “a considerable sum of money due to the substantial decreased value of the condominium if she had proceeded with its purchase. Perhaps that was the reason plaintiff chose not to consummate the sale.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
