Anticipating the ebb and flow of the law, how adversaries and we will wield it and, of course, how judges will rule so that we can best navigate and advise clients is the cornerstone of what we do. Live and paper trials warrant checklist reviews to determine whether evidence is or is not in “admissible” form for consideration by the court. Such checklists are used by proponents to make sure each submission will be considered. and by non-movants to determine whether evidence is objectionable. We all know that evidence ruled to be inadmissible can make or break a case and, thus, checklists that we each develop are crucial to helping our clients by knowing the likelihood of admissibility.
Editor’s Note: This Article has been modofied to reflect a Correction.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
