A sharply divided appeals court yesterday narrowly interpreted a state Court of Appeals ruling setting standards for when expert testimony on eyewitness identifications is required.
In doing so, the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed in People v. Santiago, 551/03, the conviction of a homeless man for slashing a college co-ed on a subway platform with a box cutter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
