In United States v. Amanuel,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit gave its most recent pronouncement and clarification of federal electronic surveillance law concerning the recording and sealing of lawfully intercepted electronic communications.
In reversing and remanding the case, the circuit reversed the district court’s suppression of all the electronic and derivative evidence against defendants, and held that the failure by police to record electronically and to seal the recordings of electronic pager communications as required by 18 U.S.C. §2518(8)(a) did not amount to a constitutional violation requiring suppression of derivative evidence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
