The steamy days of summer were far from slow-paced in the judiciary. Earmarked by the revolutionary decisions in Matter of Schneider, —N.E.2d—, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 05281, and Matter of Hyde, —N.E.2d—, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 05676, reported in my July column, the months of June, July and August were highlighted by decisions impacting the field of trusts and estates and the practice of law generally. Consider the following.
Sanctions Imposed
Although the imposition of sanctions lies within a court’s discretion, a recent decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, reveals that under appropriate circumstances, sanctions are warranted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]