In the wake of the financial crisis, credit rating agencies have been named in dozens of lawsuits by investors seeking to recover on the huge losses suffered when the subprime market collapsed. Despite widely reported shortcomings in recent years, the rating agencies have largely prevailed in these cases on motions to dismiss. In the few cases in which plaintiffs have been allowed to proceed to discovery, it is hardly certain that the rating agencies will face substantial liability for their contribution to the subprime collapse.
While courts have begun to address claims for alleged past misconduct, the new Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relaxes the pleading standard in future private securities cases against rating agencies and rescinds a Securities and Exchange Commission rule which previously exempted rating agencies from liability for false ratings in public registration statements. The new law increases the rating agencies’ future exposure to civil liability. Below, we examine how rating agencies have fared in the courts to date and how they might fare under the new rules.
Rating Agencies in the Courts
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
