A Brooklyn judge has ruled that even though the only evidence linking a defendant to a burglary—DNA on a screwdriver recovered from inside a burglarized movie theater—is “wholly circumstantial,” it is nonetheless sufficient to support an indictment.

Acting Supreme Court Justice Mark Dwyer distinguished the case from a recent Appellate Division, Second Department, decision that reversed a conviction for which the only evidence was DNA from a cigarette butt found outside a burglarized house.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]