Over the last five years, U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm of the District of Maryland has written a number of important opinions concerning electronic discovery that have established him as one of the leading voices in the field. His past opinions have addressed privilege waiver and the potential pitfalls of “quick peek” and “claw back” agreements;1 the admissibility of electronically stored information (ESI);2 and, in Victor Stanley, appropriate ESI search methodologies.3
On Sept. 9, Magistrate Judge Grimm wrote what one hopes will be the final chapter in Victor Stanley, a case that has now become the poster child for e-discovery misconduct.4
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
