Along with “sub-prime mortgages,” “credit default swaps” and “Bernie Madoff,” the phrase “auction rate securities” has become part of the lore surrounding the current economic crises. The common denominator among these is their seeming causal relationship with massive investor losses and, as sure as night follows day, when a group of investors suffers significant losses, securities litigation is sure to follow.

To some extent, however, the impetus for private civil litigation with respect to auction rate securities (ARS) was diminished by aggressive, coordinated and reasonably prompt efforts by the SEC Division of Enforcement, FINRA, the New York Attorney General’s Office and the North American Securities Administrators Association to obtain settlements—with many of the largest participants in the ARS market—structured to restore liquidity to investors.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]