Confronted with conflicting claims that a divorce judgment was procured by fraud, an appeals panel in Manhattan has ruled that a hearing must be held to determine whether the husband or wife is the guilty party. This is a "remarkable case" in which "certainly" one of the parties is lying and "possibly, but implausibly, both are lying," Justice James M. McGuire wrote in a concurring opinion.
December 30, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Confronted with conflicting claims that a 1985 divorce judgment was procured by fraud, an appeals panel in Manhattan has ruled in an unsigned opinion that a hearing must be held to determine whether the husband or wife is the guilty party.
This is a “remarkable case” in which “certainly” one of the parties is lying and “possibly, but implausibly, both are lying,” Justice James M. McGuire (See Profile) wrote in a concurring opinion.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Our client, a small but highly sophisticated and entrepreneurial tax boutique in Charleston, SC, has asked for our firm s assistance in iden...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
