The beginning of the new year seems an appropriate time to update some of the insurance fraud issues discussed in this column over the past year.
As noted here last January,1 the Court of Appeals’ decision in State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mallela2 established that a violation of a licensing requirement by a medical provider renders the provider ineligible to be reimbursed by an insurance company for no-fault3 claims that have been assigned to the provider by an individual allegedly involved in an automobile accident. The January and March Insurance Fraud columns4 discussed numerous issues left open by Mallela that continue to be litigated by both medical providers and insurance companies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
