In the course of obtaining a decree finally settling a formal judicial accounting of an estate or trust, even in uncontested matters, fiduciaries often find their accountings being scrutinized sua sponte by the Surrogate’s Courts on the issues of accountant’s fees and reimbursement of disbursements under the authority of Stortecky v. Mazzone.1

It respectfully is suggested that (1) the presently accepted manner of fixation of attorney’s fees pursuant to Matter of Potts,2 and Matter of Freeman,3 rather than on a straight percentage basis, (2) the practices and technological capabilities of present-day law offices with regard to the separate billing of disbursements, (3) statutory changes recognizing the “unbundling” of client services, (4) contemporary court decisions, and (5) the complexity of the tax laws, regulations, and forms, have rendered some of the language in the cases being relied upon by various courts on the issues of accountant’s fees and reimbursement of disbursements no longer applicable.

Accountant’s Fees

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]